Back to Groups
Education

Researchers: reproducible working notes

Literature notes, analysis records, data requests and manuscript reviews that keep evidence and assumptions separate. Replace bracketed fields before use.

workflowsreproducibilitymanuscriptsresearchacademic-researcher
LM
Lea Moreau
0likes10snippets

Try it here

Loading snippet…

Your typing stays in this tab. Nothing is saved or sent.
Snippets (10)
;res-method
Ask an author about a missing method detail
In [paper and section], how did you choose [specific parameter or procedure]? I could not find that
;res-figure
Clarify what a plotted value represents
For [figure or panel], does [axis, bar or interval] represent [interpretation A] or [interpretation
;res-data
Request data through its access process
I would like to use [dataset] to study [specific question]. The minimum fields and period needed are
;res-run
Record an analysis run
Run reference and date: [reference; date] Question tested: [question] Code and environment versions:
;res-paper
Capture a paper's usable evidence
Citation and stable identifier: [reference] Research question: [question] Study design and material:
;res-deviation
Document a change from the planned analysis
Protocol or preregistration reference: [version and section] Planned step: [original plan] Changed s
;res-contribution
Check contributor roles before submission
Please review the contribution statement for [manuscript version]: [statement or document link]. Cor
;res-null
Log a result that did not support the hypothesis
Hypothesis and planned test: [reference] Observed estimate and uncertainty: [result] Checks complete
;res-review
Write an actionable manuscript review comment
At [section, page or line], the manuscript states [claim]. The current evidence leaves [specific que
;res-actions
Record research meeting decisions
Question discussed: [research question] Decision reached: [decision, or no decision] Evidence used: